Titanic Post

By Joseph L. Galloway | McClatchy Newspapers

It took just eight decades but H.L. Mencken’s astute prediction on the future course of American presidential politics and the electorate’s taste in candidates came true:

On July 26, 1920, the acerbic and cranky scribe wrote in The Baltimore Sun: ” . . . all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most easily (and) adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum. The presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” (more…)

Published on Sunday, May 4, 2008 by PBS.org

by Bill Moyers

I once asked a reporter back from Vietnam, “Who’s telling the truth over there?” “Everyone, he said. “Everyone sees what’s happening through the lens of their own experience.” That’s how people see Jeremiah Wright. In my conversation with him on this broadcast a week ago and in his dramatic public appearances since, he revealed himself to be far more complex than the sound bites that propelled him onto the public stage. Over 2000 of you have written me about him, and your opinions vary widely. Some sting: “Jeremiah Wright is nothing more than a race-hustling, American hating radical,” one viewer wrote. A “nut case,” said another. Others were far more were sympathetic to him.

Many of you have asked for some rational explanation for Wright’s transition from reasonable conversation to shocking anger at the National Press Club. A psychologist might pull back some of the layers and see this complicated man more clearly, but I’m not a psychologist. Many black preachers I’ve known - scholarly, smart, and gentle in person - uncorked fire and brimstone in the pulpit. Of course I’ve known many white preachers like that, too. (more…)

I have a friend who has an aversion to motorcycles. Now I can understand this in part, because, even though I am a rider, there are certain kinds of motorcycles that I don’t like either. Foremost among those are those street legal racing bikes that are sold to any fool who has the money. Some of these bikes have a top speed of up to 180 miles per hour. The riders, squids in protective T-shirts and 1800 cc egos, some sporting stickers boasting, “Loud Pipes Save Lives,” are subject to a Darwin-like attrition rate, yet they are still in the gene pool.

I have the same ambivalent feelings about these kinds of bikes as I have about assault rifles. I believe that anyone should have the right to own one as long as they are as wise and responsible as I. You can see the problem with that one very easily, because if I had one, I would surely want to see if it really would go that fast or shoot that many bullets so fast. Other bikes I don’t particularly like are the pretentiously stylish ones. I pretend that I’m not pretentious and therefore ride a “sensible” ugly bike. (more…)

A majority of television scientists and newscasters do not believe that our globe is warming up and are generally doubtful that human activity could have anything to do with a potential climate change It is only among the unaffiliated liberal scientists that the cries of looming disaster are coming. These scientists generally work for universities or government agencies and are without exception funded by the government, and I don’t have to tell you what that means!

Real scientists, the ones approved by our present administration and hired by the corporations that make our country so successful, have found no evidence of climate change or a human component in our climate.

If you look closely, however, you will see that the skeptics among the scientists have affiliations or funding from large and powerful corporations that have a financial interest in supporting the idea that human driven global warning is a hoax. Those scientists that have found evidence supporting global warming and human causes tend to have more neutral sources of funding.

As a non-scientist, I think that, as a society, we should stop fouling our nest. Instead of arguing about whether or not there is a human cause of global warming or if there is a global warming, how about we stop polluting the air, the earth, and our drinking water? How about we stop wasting our resources and start appreciating the earth as our the only home we will ever have and which we should maintain and keep clean? It is not a corporate planet, it is the people’s planet. Our planet.

When the president talks to God
Are the conversations brief or long?
Does he ask to rape our women’s’ rights
And send poor farm kids off to die?
Does God suggest an oil hike
When the president talks to God?

When the president talks to God
Are the consonants all hard or soft?
Is he resolute all down the line?
Is every issue black or white?
Does what God say ever change his mind
When the president talks to God?

When the president talks to God
Does he fake that drawl or merely nod?
Agree which convicts should be killed?
Where prisons should be built and filled?
Which voter fraud must be concealed
When the president talks to God?

When the president talks to God
I wonder which one plays the better cop
We should find some jobs. the ghetto’s broke
No, they’re lazy, George, I say we don’t
Just give ‘em more liquor stores and dirty coke
That’s what God recommends

When the president talks to God
Do they drink near beer and go play golf
While they pick which countries to invade
Which Muslim souls still can be saved?
I guess god just calls a spade a spade
When the president talks to God

When the president talks to God
Does he ever think that maybe he’s not?
That that voice is just inside his head
When he kneels next to the presidential bed
Does he ever smell his own bullshit
When the president talks to God?

I doubt it

I doubt it

~Conor Oberst “Bright Eyes” on Jay Leno